Sunday, November 5, 2017

Tom DeLonge and the Beginning of Partial Disclosure – Analysis, Links, and Commentary

This post comes a bit late in comparison to the actual events discussed. Due to my situation at the time these events took place, I was unable to get this out as quickly as I had hoped. Nevertheless, I was excited to give my thoughts on the subject and hope that these considerations will help us piece together the situation of the various, oncoming narratives of disclosure. 

For a long while now, we have been hearing about this concept of disclosure from various sources in alternative media. Upon hearing the topic, we may think of examples of these efforts such as Dr. Steven Greer and the Disclosure Project panel during the early 2000s to bring the truth of UFO technology and free energy into public view.

We have heard many different sources making various claims and bringing forward different pieces of evidence about the world of the unknown. These individuals offered a wide variety of possibilities to consider about the truth of the universe beyond the Earth's surface. The testimonies vary in content and depth, and this can be confusing for many audience members. Let's see if we can break this down into a more comprehensive collection of disclosure narratives.

The Sources

Over time, we have seen various testimonies and evidence presented about the numerous topics of disclosure. Within these topics, we can easily see a distinction between the various flavors of revelation which we might see come through corporate media and various sources. For instance, it is common that we may see a headline here or there that teases public interests with talk of UFOs, ETs and other unconventional subject matters.

Along with its mundane and conventional rhetoric, the corporate media has a way of subtly suggesting these alternative topics as true and real. However, they commonly couple these subjects with the typical laughter of blind skepticism which prevails in much of American corporate media and society.
There are alternative sources which delve further into unconventional topics than corporate media would ever dare. Among these, we may see the subjects of free energy, ETs, political and economic corruption, alternative sciences, history, and more. These topics are more freely discussed by various truth communities online, and this freedom of discussion typically feeds  curious minds much more effectively than the mainstream. There are some subjects, however, that take the discussion to another level.

The subjects of pedophilia, the Secret Space Program, and the crimes against humanity that have been committed over the century to maintain secrecy are typically subjects of greatest controversy. These are also subjects which have received some of the most opposition from the establishment through various proxies.

Any time we see corporate media twisting or blindly ridiculing topics such as Pedogate or Russiagate, we can be sure there are aspects of these subjects which corporate media does not want us to consider. The most likely reason we see nighttime television shows and large media publishers attempting to dismiss pedophilia as a natural urge, mental illness, a laughable fantasy, or something that elitists would never dream of doing, we can be certain that they are hiding something.

Likewise, if corporate-media style opposition is given against the subjects of the Secret Space Program or crimes against humanity committed by the establishment, we can be sure there is an attempt at hiding some aspect of the truth, just as in other cases.

Know Your Propaganda – 'Arguing from Ignorance' – What is it and where have we seen it?

It was researcher and author, David Wilcock, who used his various avenues of research to help distinguish the different motives behind disclosure efforts. As evidence suggested, various operatives in the numerous Special Access Programs were attempting to communicate different subjects of secrecy while keeping others under lock and key. In this way, Wilcock helped make this distinction between the concepts known as partial disclosure and full disclosure.

Partial disclosure and its numerous versions may be thought of as a way of saving aspects of the old Cabal establishment so that a number of people could avoid prosecution. These prosecutions would take place due to the fact that innumerable crimes against humanity were committed to sustain the old system.

Full disclosure is a faster roll-out of disclosure material which would leave no stone unturned, so to speak. Any subject which governmental, military, religious, corporate and economic, scientific and medical establishments have kept throughout the past will be revealed. Any secrecy maintained to the detriment of humanity will be revealed in a quick and responsible way. Though the past corporate-media-style smear campaign suggested otherwise, this is what full disclosure is.

Along with David Wilcock's research, we have the in-depth analysis of Dr. Michael Salla who endeavors to examine each testimony of potential whistleblowers as they come forward. Through the work of Dr. Salla, we have been able to make further sense of the possible motives and avenues of the progressing disclosure attempts.

Later came the testimony of whistleblowers and experiencers, Michael Relfe, Laura Eisenhower, Williams Tompkins and Corey Goode. Each of these individuals claimed to have past experience in what has come to be known as the Secret Space Program—a collection of separate but similar corporate and military space programs that operate completely independently from civilization on the Earth's surface.

What has been interesting about testimonies such as these is the congruence between them which was noted prior to any of these individuals meeting one another. What is even more interesting about this testimony is that Corey Goode in particular has been able to accurately predict the actions of the corporate media and the efforts to of the Military Industrial Complex in their disclosure efforts—suggesting that he is more than simply a lucky guesser.  This also suggests that Goode in still in contact with those he claims to speak with from the Air Force branch of the Secret Space Program.

For specific details, read here.

In my view, this suggests that the testimonies of Goode and each of these whistleblowers deserve serious consideration. We may want to keep in mind that Goode is one of the only former SSP operatives who is advocating for a full disclosure of all former secrecy at this point. Though a number of disclosure advocates have come forward to give their testimony, not all of these individuals appear to want the entire truth to be revealed.

Due to the difference of intent in disclosure, there has been a certain divide within alternative media between these two positions. The first being that all truth should be released to the public and the second maintains that revealing the whole truth is dangerous. It also maintains that only a fraction of the truth should be revealed at any given time, and that if the whole truth is revealed, it would only be released over the course of a century.

Partial vs. Full Disclosure

This divide has been seen in the past with a very visible smear campaign launched in social media against all of those who have promoted Full Disclosure. These smear attempts were predicted by Corey Goode months before they began. As Goode stated, in order to succeed at partial disclosure, certain interests felt that they had to attack and discredit those who advocated for Full Disclosure. Though the efforts to smear these advocates were extensive, it is fairly clear that the smear efforts failed.

Personal and Global Attacks Become Lethal: Is the Disclosure War Reaching a Climax? [Part I] - Links and Commentary Included

The failed smear campaign was followed by attempt to censor those who continued to promote a complete revelation of the truth, but again these efforts failed as well. Many of us may know that social media platform, YouTube, has been actively censoring users outside of official YouTube polices and possibly even outside of American law.

Any channel which has promoted the need for revelations into pedophilia and investigation into Wikileaks emails seems to have been systematically censored on YouTube and prevented from speaking about the need for investigation into the crimes of elitists.

To add to the list of truths that have been omitted from mainstream narratives are the list of mysterious deaths of doctors in alternative medicine. The number of dead and murdered doctors has reached over 100 over the past several years. It seems that either this is the most alarming coincidence in history, or there is someone with deadly intentions to silence doctors who do not follow the mainstream narrative.

Many of these murdered doctors were advocates against vaccination and spoke out about the possible risks some vaccines presented in their present state of production. These doctors opposed the mainstream narrative while their conventional counterparts blindly pushed mandatory vaccinations. The deaths of these alternative doctors shows us that there are numerous unanswered questions within healthcare that certain powerful interests do not want the general public to know. It also seems that certain interests would do anything to keep their secrets hidden—even murder by the hundreds.

Know Your Propaganda – Card Stacking, Cherry Picking and Controlling the Message

The Secret Space Program, corruption in the American medical system, and the issues of Pedogate only represent a small portion of the truth that awaits us behind an apparent wall of secrecy. Each of these issues of secrecy must be addressed in order to ensure true freedom and accountability in our world. Only by revealing the entirety of secrets like these can we hold those responsible for any damages caused by these secrets. Moreover, the revelation of these crimes is the fastest and most effective way of putting these atrocities to an end. However, Mr. Delonge never even touches these subjects in his partial disclosure. Despite the immense weight of their consequence and the countless questions they raise, these subjects are omitted from consideration altogether.

The Problem with the Entertainment Industry

One distinction between the partial disclosure narratives and the efforts of Full Disclosure has become fully obvious to most of those making the effort to pay attention. That distinguishing factor is that partial disclosure is said to be designed by those who have hidden agendas in mind. This half-truth-based disclosure may be concocted of several different truths, which by themselves, would astound and amaze the uninformed public. However, little would the public know that the most impactful aspects of truth were under tight lock and key by the powers that be.
The partial disclosure efforts have been promoted by the mainstream, elitist-controlled media in order to prevent the people from knowing what the cost of secrecy has been. We have actually been seeing this narrative on television, in video games and in movies for years now. Yet very few have actually noticed these changes.

The world of big entertainment represents somewhat of a dichotomy. Some see entertainment as the epitome of fame and fortune while others regard it as a laughing stock. Among those who still admire established entertainment, countless actors and artists from many backgrounds and genre of entertainment are given the image of glamour and prestige. In music, artists are glorified as modern prophets on stage. Yet behind the scenes, many of these artists receive different treatment from sponsors and the financial powers that fund their musical success.

Artists such a Tom Delonge have historically been treated as indentured servants to the companies that fund musicians. Corporations such as Sony have been notorious for abusing and mistreating their musicians—treating them as little better than slaves or physical property. These artists are forced to sign disadvantageous deals, bound by stringent contracts, and are commonly forced to compromise their artistic expression for the sake of corporate gain.

On an even darker side of business lies another portion of the entertainment industry—one of greed, political, and corporate advantage. As musicians and actors gain fame, they naturally gain influence over millions of people worldwide. This appears to be well-known among actors and artists. It is also well-known among the companies who fund these artists. Naturally these artists are compelled to play by the rules of those who fund them. In other words, in order to gain fame, these artists must agree to work toward the benefit of the profit margins of the corporations that fund them.
It would makes sense that corporations would only fund artists who agreed to work toward the advantage of corporate profit, or at the very least, these artists must refuse to work against corporate advantage. This would mean that any economic or political scheme which these corporations endeavored to support would be off limits to any artist these companies sponsored. The artists and musicians would either stay completely silent about the issues altogether, or they might be commissioned to be spokespeople for these corporate or political interests.

Artists Turn to Political Extremes

Have you noticed how awkwardly political musicians have become within the last several years? Artists such as Eminem, Miley Cyrus, B.O.B., Madonna, Katie Perry, Lady Gaga, and many others have, for some reason, ventured into the political world to be outspoken toward certain political ends. Considering the fact that these artists are under contract, they would not be allowed to speak against their own funding. This would mean that the political interest and the corporate interest they speak for might either be one and the same, or may be working toward the same goals. This raises some very important questions, I believe.

If corporate and political interests are the end goal for the political stances of popular artists, what advantage do the common people have at blindly agreeing with such corporately-driven messages?

When considering these possibilities—combined with what we have already learned about the Sony Music Company and their connection with the RAND Corporation—what are the chances that a formerly popular and world-renowned artists such as Tom Delonge is a part of these same political and corporate efforts at promoting some profitable advantage to corporate interests?

It seems clear that there are far more truths to be uncovered than Delonge claims to exist. Though I feel his efforts at some amount of disclosure are admirable, they represent only a half-hearted attempt at uncovering real truth. Delonge's efforts to avoid placing emphasis on the dire need for medical disclosure, disclosure of military and religious secrecy, and the mass-murder and crimes against humanity, are palpable. Each of these atrocities was committed by corporate interests who have done everything in their power to censor and prevent these truths from coming forward. However, these efforts at secrecy appear to be imploding.

The Proposed JFK Disclosure – A True Move Toward Disclosure and Transparency, Or Something Else?

The major concern among many people within these recent acts of partial disclosure is their connection with suspected rapists and pedophile, John Podesta. The evidence that Podesta is guilty of the crimes he himself alluded to in his own emails is overwhelming. Combined with the complacency of American law enforcement and their refusal to do their jobs in this matter, the act of working with this above-the-law suspect does not speak well to one's own judgment or ability of observation.

Better than Silence

It is helpful for some individuals with public influence, such as Delonge, to begin talking about issues of secrecy and the unknown, as this helps those who still have not caught onto such issues to begin exploring the possibilities behind the commonly-accepted illusion of societal normalcy. Figures such as Dr. Steven Greer began to shed light on a few of the issues which most considered laughable at the time. Greer presented a compelling case which caused many to seriously consider the possibility that UFOs and free energy as real and true phenomena.

Though individuals such as Dr. Greer and Tom Delonge seem to only intend to reveal a small portion of the truth instead of the whole, these disclosures may help open the door to further questions. As these questions gradually awaken the world's population to greater possibilities, we will be better prepared to handle further—possibly more shocking, but extremely liberating—truths that are awaiting our attention.
Related Topics...

Who Controls the World? - The True Story behind Money and Media Manipulation with TED X - Video, Links and Extended Commentary

Wisdom Teachings with David Wilcock - NASA's Quiet Disclosure Part 1

Wisdom Teachings with David Wilcock - “The Cabal’s Downward Spiral” - Assessing the Final Days of a Crumbling Cabal, and a Prelude to Breakthrough

Wisdom Teachings with David Wilcock - Business not as Usual - Examining Clear Signs of Progress toward Planetary Liberation

Unmasking Fascism - The United Nations Makes a Shocking Admission about Syria and Western Corruption - Commentary and Links Included

Thanks for reading.

Discerning the Mystery is a project I started to help wake the people up to their true potential of spiritual, emotional, and physical growth. It can be difficult work, but if I am successful, it is all worth it. If you enjoy what you read, please give this a like and share on Facebook and social media. Also, if you feel so inclined, please give a donation.

Feel free to send me an email and tell me what you think. If you have any suggestions or subjects you would like to see discussed, please let me know.

No comments:

Post a Comment