It seems that 2017 is turning out to be the year of disclosure. The steady stream of new revelations by the corporate and reliable alternative media have clearly indicated that something behind the scenes has shifted for the sake of truth and honesty.
We saw this trend start to pick up speed in November and December of 2016, when thousands of citizens from around the world chose to take investigations of pedophilia and child tracking into their own hands. From these investigations, these people realized that the festering problem of pedophilia was very real despite the corporate media's attempt to hide and dismiss the fact.
While these investigations on pedophilia were being censored by mainstream media and major online companies, other disclosures were taking place. The admission of the EPA that fracking causes pollution in drinking water was another major win for the citizens of America. One would think that such an obvious problem as fresh water pollution on a continental scale would be handled more responsibly in a free country, and they are right. It would. Only America has not been shown to be that free country, but has instead served as a playground for corporate criminals.
These criminals used to set the game by their own rules, and then hang the rest of the population out to dry. However, it seems that this new trend of truth-telling has revealed that the people and the system is turning on the billionaire class, and back to the favor of the people where it belongs.
Perhaps some of the most profound disclosures relate to the recent excavation efforts in Antarctica. It seems that even in the mainstream media, reports of odd goings-on on this barren continent have revealed that there is much more to be discovered than previously assumed.
ENDGAME II: The Antarctic Atlantis and Ancient ET Ruins
Up until this point, geologists maintained that Antarctica has never been anything but a frozen wasteland and that the Earth has never undergone such drastic changes that would change a tropical climate into arctic tundra for thousands of years. Yet the evidence reported to be coming from the Antarctic expedition seems to suggest otherwise. It stands to reason that if any signs of significant human population on this continent are found, history as we know it will change.
There are many more disclosures coming forward. Some of them seemingly shocking. Others are astounding at their potentially positive impact on humanity as we know it. On this subject, we turn to the article of interest which discusses an admission by the EPA that many of us have known for years now.
The timing of this admission is very interesting and seems to coincide with all of the other ground-shaking revelations we have heard in recent times. All of these changes appear to be extremely significant, but fewer revelations can be more beneficial than those which affect our health and wellness.
ENDGAME II: The Antarctic Atlantis and Ancient ET Ruins
Up until this point, geologists maintained that Antarctica has never been anything but a frozen wasteland and that the Earth has never undergone such drastic changes that would change a tropical climate into arctic tundra for thousands of years. Yet the evidence reported to be coming from the Antarctic expedition seems to suggest otherwise. It stands to reason that if any signs of significant human population on this continent are found, history as we know it will change.
There are many more disclosures coming forward. Some of them seemingly shocking. Others are astounding at their potentially positive impact on humanity as we know it. On this subject, we turn to the article of interest which discusses an admission by the EPA that many of us have known for years now.
The timing of this admission is very interesting and seems to coincide with all of the other ground-shaking revelations we have heard in recent times. All of these changes appear to be extremely significant, but fewer revelations can be more beneficial than those which affect our health and wellness.
* * * * *
Source: Collective Evolution
Published: January 14, 2017
By: Alanna Ketler
A few weeks ago, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was served with a Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) petition, from a coalition of environmental, medical, and health groups, including national non-profit Moms Against Fluoridation (MAF). This notice is calling on the agency to completely ban the addition of artificial fluoridation chemicals to public water supplies due to an astounding amount of evidence that proves the risks that the consumption of such chemicals pose to the brain.
The TSCA Petition includes over 2500 pages of scientific documents to support its claims that drinking water that has been fluoridated has the potential to cause profound harmful effects on the brain. These effects were not yet understood years ago when communities began adding fluoride and other chemicals to the municipal drinking water supply.
C-SPAN - Senator Thom Tillis: 81 US Interventions in Elections - Video, Commentary and Links
Science is now a lot more sophisticated than it was at that time, and the proper laboratory tools and technologies are now available to more accurately examine the brain in greater detail. The petition reveals evidence of broad changes to the brain due to water fluoridation such as: IQ deficits, neuroanatomical and chemical effects, and the dire concerns of the effects on the developing fetal brain.
“In times past when fluoridation was instituted, science only had the scalpel or basic X-ray technology, and we simply weren’t able to assess the brain in the way technology can today,” states MAF leadership.
Because this petition was filed under the TSCA it authorizes the EPA with the ability to prohibit the “particular use” of a chemical that presents an “unreasonable risk” to the general public or any sub-populations that are susceptible. This petition argues that the addition of artificial water fluoridation chemicals now absolutely constitutes an “unreasonable risk” to citizens. These risks have now been revealed by 196 new scientific studies that are included in the petition.
Over A Decade Of Increasing Scientific Concern
“…it is apparent that fluorides have the ability to interfere with the functions of the brain and the body by direct and indirect means.”
“Not only do fluorides [adversely] affect transmitter concentrations and functions but also are involved in the regulation of glucagon, prostaglandins, and a number of central nervous system peptides including vasopressin… and other hypothalamic peptides.”
“Fluorides also increase the production of free radicals in the brain through several different biological pathways. These changes have a bearing on the possibility that fluorides act to increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.”
Dozens more findings such as the ones listed above were published in the 507 page NRC report.
If you’re wondering about the reported benefits that drinking fluoridated water has on our teeth, well those questions were addressed as well. Author of the petition, Michael Connet says, “It is now understood that fluoride’s predominant effect on tooth decay comes from topical contact with the teeth, not ingestion.”
UPDATE - Intel from Retired Sergeant Clifford Stone, CIA-Based Fake News on YouTube, Siberian Cooperation with ET Disclosure Efforts, and More
The Petition states: “Since there is little benefit in swallowing fluoride, there is little justification in exposing the public to any risk of fluoride neurotoxicity…”
“It is important to note,” says a MAF representative, “that not only does it appear that drinking fluoride does nothing for the enamel, but not a single long-term fluoridation safety trial has ever been conducted on the fetus, the brain or the thyroid by our government. Not one.”
It certainly appears as though the government has not done any safety trials on the effects of fluoride at all, but luckily there are many scientists around the world that are interested in fluoride and its toxic effects. The research has become so extensive that it can now be classified as in the same category as lead, mercury and PCBs as one of the “developmental neurotoxicants” according to the journal, Lancet Neurology.
Physicians are also deeply concerned about adding this chemical to the drinking water, as Angela Hind, M.D. notes: “Right now we have 1 in 6 children in the U.S. with neuro-developmental brain disease, including ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorders, low IQ and behavioral disorders, and 1 in 8 women who will develop thyroid disease. These two epidemics tell us that chemicals like fluoride and lead, both developmental neurotoxins and endocrine disruptors, have no place in our public water.”
EPA Finally Concludes Fracking Pollutes Drinking Water
Leading professionals in the field of dentistry are bothered as well. “As a practicing general dentist of 39 years, I was stunned when I saw the studies demonstrating the effects that drinking artificial fluoridation chemicals can have on the body—particularly, on the brain,” comments Dr. Bill Osmunson, D.D.S. of Bellevue, Washington.
“This Petition is a watershed,” adds MAF. “Just as people once thought lead, DDT and asbestos were safe, there was a time, after much work and pushing by the people, when those erroneous assumptions shifted and the policies were forced to change. This is now that time for artificial fluoridation chemicals, as the science raises far too many concerns, and the EPA must act to protect the people.”
Read more at: CollectEvolution com
Related Topics...
EPA Finally Concludes Fracking Pollutes Drinking Water
The Cyber-War on Wikileaks - A Poignant Conversation between Julian Assange and Writer, Srecko Horvat - Related Links Included
C-SPAN - Senator Thom Tillis: 81 US Interventions in Elections - Video, Commentary and Links
4 Good Reasons Total Disclosure Could Happen in 2017
ENDGAME II: The Antarctic Atlantis and Ancient ET Ruins
Feds Confirm the Chicago Police Department is as Corrupt as We Thought
Unmasking Fascism - The United Nations Makes a Shocking Admission about Syria and Western Corruption - Commentary and Links Included
Thanks for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment